The Picture of Dorian Gray was written by Oscar Wilde
in 1891. In the Preface Wilde discusses his definition of art. I have provided
it here for your convenience.
The artist is the creator of beautiful things. To reveal art and conceal
the artist is art's aim. The critic is he who can translate into another manner
or a new material his impression of beautiful things.
The highest as the lowest form of
criticism is a mode of autobiography. Those who find ugly meanings in beautiful
things are corrupt without being charming. This is a fault.
Those who find beautiful meanings
in beautiful things are the cultivated. For these there is hope. They are the
elect to whom beautiful things mean only beauty.
There is no such thing as a moral
or an immoral book. Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.
The nineteenth century dislike of
realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass.
The nineteenth century dislike of
romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass. The
moral life of man forms part of the subject-matter of the artist, but the
morality of art consists in the perfect use of an imperfect medium. No artist
desires to prove anything. Even things that are true can be proved. No artist
has ethical sympathies. An ethical sympathy in an artist is an unpardonable
mannerism of style. No artist is ever morbid. The artist can express
everything. Thought and language are to the artist instruments of an art. Vice
and virtue are to the artist materials for an art. From the point of view of
form, the type of all the arts is the art of the musician. From the point of
view of feeling, the actor's craft is the type. All art is at once surface and
symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read
the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art
really mirrors. Diversity of opinion about a work of art shows that the work is
new, complex, and vital. When critics disagree, the artist is in accord with
himself. We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not
admire it. The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one admires it
intensely.
All art is quite useless.
OSCAR WILDE
This view of art isn’t held only by
Wilde. Even 121 years later I know people who would agree with this description.
Over the past several months I have come to understand art as being a form of
expression that is meant, at a minimum, to illicit an emotional or intellectual
response from the viewer. With in “what art is”, there is a virtual cornucopia of
“what is art”.
That is a more daunting question
which I am still working on defining. In a recent conversation with a fellow
art student about how anything that defines a culture can be defined as Art. He
stumped with asking is sports was art.
For more on this subject, refer to
the topic: Jordan Tate.
No comments:
Post a Comment